Repository | Book | Chapter

175968

(1976) Analytic philosophy and phenomenology, Dordrecht, Springer.

Hare, Husserl, and philosophic discovery

John Compton

pp. 208-216

The question whether linguistic philosophy and phenomenology have any significant common ground has been raised increasingly in recent years. It seems to me that one useful means of exploring this question is to examine descriptions of the very concept of philosophical analysis which each involves so as to suggest relevant similarities in aims and methods. There are many such affinities — and I shall want to mention some, ones which are important for establishing communication between these traditions customarily considered so disparate. There are also fundamental differences not only in techniques and doctrines but in style and, one might say, in cultural temper. This is to say nothing of the extensive variation and bitter disagreements internal to each tradition itself — among the proponents of early and late Wittgenstein, among followers of the early and late Husserl, and of course, within the personal evolution of these formative giants themselves.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1407-6_12

Full citation:

Compton, J. (1976)., Hare, Husserl, and philosophic discovery, in H. Durfee (ed.), Analytic philosophy and phenomenology, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 208-216.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.