237196

(2003) Synthese 136 (2).

Why evolution is really indeterministic

Roger Sansom

pp. 263-279

Leslie Graves, Barbara Horan and Alex Rosenberg (1999) have argued that the process of evolution is really deterministic, so we should be instrumentalists about our probabilistic evolutionary theory. I criticize the consistency of their view. I argue that because they are realists towards multiple theories (quantum mechanics and macrophysics) their arguments against realism for another scientific theory fail. The main point of this paper is critical, but in order to set up this criticism I explore the ramifications of realism for multiple theories. Finally, I offer a brief metaphysical justification for realism about multiple theories. This view justifies realism for evolutionary theory, which has been defended by Robert Brandon and Scott Carson (1996).

Publication details

DOI: 10.1023/A:1024739731042

Full citation:

Sansom, R. (2003). Why evolution is really indeterministic. Synthese 136 (2), pp. 263-279.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.