Daniel Andler
(2014). Is social constructivism soluble in critical naturalism?. In D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, M. Weber, & M. C. Galavotti (Eds.). New directions in the philosophy of science (pp. 279-295). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2013). Dissensus in science as a fact and as a norm. In H. Andersen, D. Dieks, T. Uebel, W. J. González, & G. Wheeler (Eds.). New challenges to philosophy of science (pp. 493-506). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2011). Unity without myths. In J. Symons, O. Pombo, & J. M. . Torres (Eds.). Otto Neurath and the unity of science (pp. 129-144). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2010). Is naturalism the unsurpassable philosophy for the sciences of man in the 21st century?. In F. Stadler (Ed.). The present situation in the philosophy of science (pp. 283-303). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2010). Naturalism and the scientific status of the social sciences. In M. Surez, M. Dorato, & M. Rédei (Eds.). Epsa epistemology and methodology of science (pp. 1-12). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2009). Philosophy of cognitive science. In A. Brenner (Ed.). French studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 255-300). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2006). Federalism in science — complementarity vs perspectivism: reply to Harré. Synthese, 151 (3), 519-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9022-3.